Everyone’s path of salvation is different. There is no way for man to see the full picture, not of his own life or the life of another. In the specifics of loving each person and our own lives, we love God and are changed as He wills. This is one’s path to becoming holy, to salvation. It is all through the cost of love.
On the way to church my four year old asked: How do we know God’s love? My husband had a hockey game and opted to attend a nearby parish, leaving me with our two and four year olds. It would be another day juggling responsibilities, distracted by wiggling little bodies, too-loud giggles in church, my own hunger for peace and rest and quiet that wouldn’t come for days. Budding irritation for my husband Dima’s last minute decision not to help me would grow as the week pressed on. Tuesday night the children and I cozied together on the couch for our library movie, the story of Anne Frank. Daddy wouldn’t be home until past bedtime. Dinner was a conglomerate of ease and fridge-cleanout: noodles and turkey, fruit and bagels, blue yogurt. Dima’s silenced complaints over feeding the children artificial coloring and allowing them a too-late bedtime left me feeling a mix of hallow and happy. My baby, who calls himself big-boy, scattered the family room with blocks and balls and entered a world of creation, possibility. I, too, fell away from reality, drawing into a haunting story of judgment.
The story of Anne Frank has become common knowledge. But as I watched a passionate girl with sensitivity and faith in life, birds and love, with curiosity in her changing body, as I listened to her question the meaning of life, first holding her father in their warm, safe home, and later her dying sister, a course piece of wool about her own naked, withered body, I absorbed the essence of Anne. I find her in me. I experienced the picture of hell, viewed it in my heart, and mourn still. That night, I lay awake, holding the cross around my neck, thinking about Anne Frank. I prayed for her. How could a God of love possibly have let the Holocaust happen? It seems impossible that such cruelty actually happened, that it happens still.
Dima often watches documentaries depicting history and politics, foreign and American. He is on fire when he talks of Iran, Iraq, Afghanistan—of the potential for another world war. When he talks of Russia and WWII and the suffering of his own family, I shudder and wonder at the atrocities that I am afraid to believe occur. When he rages, the revulsions seem impossibly big. Yet, when I see Anne, when I watch her falling in love with a boy, staring into the sky, still grateful for stars even in the worst conditions of a concentration camp, then her suffering, our suffering, is real to me. Fear is unrelenting. Death, even misery, I can accept with less horror, I think, but to imagine the cruelty that one person might have for another, the ways power corrupts, the ramped rule of evil throughout the ages, in all places, this I cannot reconcile against my son’s question: How do we know God’s love?
Though still I haven’t a response that budges beyond the obvious to this question—that we know His love in knowing love for each other and all created things, protopresbyter Thomas Hopko[1] writes about what each might be certain of: “We can cooperate with God. We can share His holiness. We can become, as the saints themselves teach us, all that God Himself is by His gracious action in our lives. We can become loving, peaceful, joyful, good, wise, true, patient, kind, compassionate, powerful, pure, and free. Or we can refuse to cooperate with God, never find our true selves, and perish” (4). He continues, explaining that some will suffer and others will suffer much, much less; some will be tempted with great burdens, some will marry, some will stay single, some fight bad memories of abuse and still others will come from and create healthy, happy homes. “Each must find his or her own way and glorify God through it. Ultimately, this is all that matters. The rest is detail.” Though it may seem unfair, even grossly unjust, merciless and terrible, the world’s notion of equality, namely sameness, is untrue in the context of the spiritual. God knows. I do not. I cannot understand, but I might accept life as it is, for me, for others.
Perhaps Anne Frank lived the best she could. I wonder how God would receive her. Had she ever been taught of Jesus Christ; had she enough life to show her the love of our Savior? Facing unutterable hate from man, how could she know, accept or grow in faith? Did God seem abstract when the birds had all died, along with her family? Jesus was crucified, but it might seem his suffering was over quickly compared to Anne’s fate. Yet, if He is love, then He, too, suffered with her, aching for the hate that his creature endured. I know in my head that God’s plan will prevail, that there is nothing that can separate us from His love, no present suffering can compare to the Kingdom of God prepared for those who love the Lord…. My heart cannot settle the sadness of one who, perhaps because of blinding pain, may not have had room to see Him. Anne Frank was a child when she died. What would I have felt, thought, believed at sixteen, in a concentration camp filled with rats and lice?
It is true that suffering opens the heart to God. When Dima returned from hockey, I told him I liked not having his voice over my shoulder with the boys, thinking of blue yogurt and lax rules. The tender pain of last year is re-felt with as little as a glimpse across the room at his hard face. We have come so far these past two years, nine years since our marriage. Just last year, my hands had been cold and numb with the feel of impossible union. In our kitchen, through tears and silent prayers, the green plant on the shelf grew strong. Through the strain of doubts and lovelessness, there were moments I’d felt the increase of peace, strength, and joy—but I hadn’t known how to communicate this goodness to Dima. A counselor had helped. Our babies had grown. His parents, moved from Russia two years before, had settled. The fights come still, but the cold is warmed, and the way to mutual peace is less buried. We sift through feelings, both grabbing for what will bring us into each other’s arms. We are hungry for the other’s love, and even know it better through the fear of loss. Our suffering was limited, though at the time it seemed impossible to bear one more bout of screaming that tore at the other’s emotions and to pull from the bog of thick silence.
God’s goal is that we live happily ever after, Dr. Philip Mamalakis[2] commented on a recent Ancient Faith Radio podcast. Happiness is the experience of peace, the feeling of patience and ease of mind. God’s will, he continues, is that each would seek the Kingdom of God. This seeking is unique. There exists no formula—the expression of God in each life is revelatory, just as it has always been. The mark of a God-given path is growing peace, strength and joy, regardless of countless circumstances through which people endure. This seems nothing more than an abstraction when I think of Anne Frank, and others like her, children, woman with babies, people like me called to endure suffering that I cannot fathom.
Expressing one’s great suffering relates another in the common bond of humanity, even when life situations may vary on most other levels. In this way, hardships can serve as catalysts to unity, to love. Like meaningful movies, good books unveil mysteries of life. In The Brothers Karamozov, Mitya (Dimitri) falls in love with Grusha. His love for this woman becomes a perversion of passion, instead of true love as redemptive and inspiring of self-emptying. His love is wild because, at this time, he is wild with lust and avarice and need. It is thought he kills his father in such a frenzied state because of his father’s love of Grusha and coincidental murder. In the experience of realizing his love is shared by Grusha, Mitya changes, though, and the extent of his change of heart is revealed as he confides in his brother Alyosha (a former monk) awaiting accusation of their father’s murder:
You know, in these past two months, it’s as if I’d found a new man in myself, as if a new man had arisen in me! That man was locked inside me, but he would never have come out if it hadn’t been for this terrible blow of fate. It’s frightening! What does it matter if I spend the next twenty years in the mines, knocking out the ore with a hammer? That’s not what I’m afraid of. What I’m terribly afraid of is that this new man within me may desert me! I’m sure I could find, underground in the mines there, a true human heart within another convict, a murderer working next to me, and I could befriend him, for in the mines, too, people can live and love and suffer! It would be possible to bring back to life a heart that had long been dead and frozen. I could work on it for years, and finally, out of that infernal den, a soul would emerge that was noble for having known suffering. […]. Oh, I realize, we’ll all be wearing chains and we’ll be deprived of our freedom. But then, in our great misery we shall arise again and know the joy without which a man cannot live and God cannot exist, because God gives us joy and giving it is His great privilege. Oh Lord, may man dissolve in prayer! But what would I do there, underground, without God? (711)
Dostoevsky is said to capture the essence of the Russian people during the nineteenth century. His characters are philosophical, troubled by conflicting natures of good and evil, and highly emotional. It is said that his novels depict the redemptive nature of suffering and the ultimate potential for unity among humanity and within man towards God. Even Mitya, a fictional character over one-hundred years old and from another country, shows God’s changing grace in life through suffering that breaks one’s self will.
I can see that marriage is a path to holiness, taking a child and growing her into a woman, allowing a choice for love that breaks her from the binds of infantile self knowing. Marriage challenges two people from different homes to become one, and through such unity to love God. Love is redemptive. It unmasks sinful nature and one longs to be better. Scales fall. One off, and I see that the lack of joy in me is a need to love those in my life. Another loosed, and I sense the vanity that delights and then insults me, so on and off, so unpredictable, so controlling. The scale that comes off and returns, plastered on: depression, anxiety, my strong will that often counters good. Most recently, I notice ambition is escape. The nervous flutter inside as I check e-mail, hoping to “hear” from someone, drones out the crying baby, the laughing, jumping toddler. My four year old answers the phone because I’m “conversing” in silence, in my head, with the distant, deep and winding thoughts of un-answering nobodies. To change takes time and energy and perhaps is never complete in this life, which is why I question the assurance I’d once assumed of salvation. And if pain is constant, there isn’t enough within to move beyond despair. Miracles happen. God could save one. Does He always? He has said he will only allow what one can bear. In the film on Anne, the women arrive at a concentration camp. One says that she thinks of Job, but another says their situation is not the same, that Job could talk back to God and the world wasn’t against him. Job didn’t have to squat like an animal in front of monsters. It is clear, faith ebbs. Suffering doesn’t always allow it growth, but can kill it.
Relationship with others is a constant chance for faith. Our choice to love is independent of the other’s. I remember feeling Dima was impossible during our coldest moments. He wanted my love but crossed his arms over his chest and refused my embrace. I was lost on how to express love. Then, the feeling of love would leave. I no longer wanted to reach out and heal us. However, I was most free, most able to talk with the Lord, when my conscience was clear. I had to love him, with silence or kind words, through dinner, a walk, accepting his pain as my own. There were moments when I knew my choice for love was independent of Dima—that my love had to be free of any expectation. Fearless and clear. Because of this experience, I understand when Mamalakis says that the choice to seek to serve Christ is independent of our spouse. I would add that to a degree seeking God is independent of our situation, our suffering, for it is a choice that we must make and God, if He is Love, would provide the way in each and every situation. He uses an illustration of a marriage where there is lack of emotional connection but there isn’t overt tension either. He says that it is better to stay together, to endure, than to divorce. This may be one’s path of salvation, to love without passion. For the path of salvation costs each his / her selfishness. It is about replacing self-love with love for others, and so God. However, in abusive marriages, it is better to divorce, Mamalakis explains the Church’s teaching on economia—the practical application of God’s saving love.
It is in this pragmatic vein of God’s love that I wonder about deep suffering, for might the worst situations also be enough to allow one salvation in enduring the situation until death, crying out for God who seems all but gone? To put this thought in a context, how could Anne Frank be expected to convert from Judaism to Christianity, to study the teachings of a loving Savior and embrace Him in such a time? Maybe He visited her. Maybe the stories we hear are nothing compared to the spiritual realities of such suffering people. For we know from various accounts that Christ has appeared to people in dreams and visions. In fact, today, October first, the Church celebrates the Mother of God and her protection over people. For she was seen holding a banner of protection above a gathering of faithful in the six hundreds. Still, what of all those who do not know Christ? The Mother of God visited me in Russia, before I knew her. She held me. It was a feeling that I’d had and now believe was the beginning of my relationship with her. But it has taken years to understand that amazing feeling, to look through myself and see love for the Mother of God protecting and guiding me throughout life.
Life is a process of gaining wisdom—sorting through thoughts and feelings and realizing the natures at work in us. Through marriage, Mamalakis explains, we love who are spouse really is, not who we think he / she is. In the same way, we learn who we are and who God is, as far as each allows the redemptive nature of love to clear delusions. In the Orthodox marriage ceremony, Christ, in the person of the priest, unites a man and woman. Marriage is a sacrament, a means through which God’s saving energies work in us, change us, and ultimately save us. It is God’s own love that unites two in marriage, but each must be receptive of this love in order to be changed and to offer true and transforming love to one’s spouse. We bring God to our beloved, just as the Church, God’s bridegroom, brings His love to all people. This may sound abstract. It is not. In marriage, we are called to love a person more than ourselves, to exchange martyrs’ crowns, as is done in Orthodox Christian wedding ceremonies, symbolizing death of self.
This death may not be literal. I e-mailed Dima at work and asked if he were sad. I told him to take his half day (a weekly benefit, despite the loss of money, the nation’s economic strain allows us) and come home. Our children were with my mother, as it was a day I teach, prepare lessons, write. Dima came home. We fried tuna fish and potatoes in my yogurt sauce. We shared love in the quiet afternoon sun. Dima stood before the window in our kitchen, slight smile on his handsome face, clad in his ancient St. Petersburg tee-shirt. I said, “There’s nothing we can do about it—we need each other’s love. Which means we need each other.” It was good to face the truth of love: we have to give in, give over, to experience the oneness for which we so long. Dr. Mamalakis explains that marriage forces us to notice the unhealthy patterns of intimacy we have and to choose to be open to the grace of God that can change us to be loving of another. He admits that many complain of the impossibility of change on their own, but it is in this weakness we know the power of our loving God.
I have experienced healing in the Holy Spirit through suffering. Tears flood the heart. We cannot escape ourselves, no matter how acute the pain, no matter how great the urge to abandon. And, ironically, in great pain is the mystery of learning great love—lessoning care for the self and turning to Peace, despite it all. Of course, one might also choose hell: faithlessness in man and God. It seems, in truth, we each vacillate between these extremes, but with the increase of love actively changing one’s life, the natural response of loving comes easier. This is healing, in marriage, in the Church, in the world between all people, indeed, within each person. This was easier to believe before I sat still and experienced the life of Anne Frank. For, if I compare two years of her life in hiding and concentration camps, in wasting away and watching her family, friends and most around her grow diseased and barbaric, to my own emotional barrenness with a man whom I love, suffering, though of the same nature, has definite degrees. And consequences to the soul along with the body and mind.
Fr. Hopko says that one must will to know God’s will, and the sign of this is being faithful in whatever conditions of life. Life’s conditions are unique. Some will use their bodies, others will use their intellect, some perhaps both or neither. I was on a walk at the metro-park after teaching a long class. It was raining, steady and soft. My body was yet again tender, mind troubled. Recently, in a talk with the counselor Dima and I visited, the doctor offered: “You are a nervous person with a nervous system.” Though I’d known this, having it articulated pin-pointed the reason for my perpetually upset stomach. Irritable bowel affects one in five, but despite this common condition, it can depress me to constantly feel ill—too empty, too full. In such a state, I hid behind a tree, grateful the rain kept the park mostly empty. Returning on the path, I walked up to an elderly man. He was stooped with neat white hair and a wiry body, like my grandfather’s. I slipped by, laughing, we won’t melt, noting his serious response. I hope not. I caught up to a creeping lizard a few feet beyond him, calling back. He came up to the tiny, slithering reptile and together we marveled. He wondered aloud about the earthworms that had disappeared. I told him of a student’s essay on going-extinct monarch butterflies. Neither of us had an answer to why animals seemed fewer. But we were both bothered by this. It opened us to talk of life. He said he’d owned a drywall company, that he worked with his hands. I said I was a writer and teacher. He said that his brain never worked very well for him. When I told him it was often difficult to turn my mind on to the immediate things around me, that I was somewhere other than with my husband, children, he countered my concern and suggested that mental energy might move me to do things. I hadn’t thought of it that way, for it could seem a hindrance to doing other things. Unlike the other, it was easier to see a part of the picture of unity the Lord intends. Each one, His. Each one, unique. Each needed and purposed.
We know God’s love because we feel it. We think it, smell, taste, touch, hear, see—experience it. Though marriage can be a journey to perfect love, Mamalakis paraphrases St. John Chrysostom in saying that the goal of a Christian’s life is not marriage. The goal of each one’s life is to seek the Kingdom of God at all costs. For many in this world, the sacrament of marriage becomes the way of life through which holiness is the goal. However, whether single or married, happy or hurting, holiness, the redirection of self-love to God-love, is the ultimate end.
For everywhere there is goodness, there is God. Since God is in and through all, goodness also is always with us, even in suffering, even in not obtaining what we will, like a spouse, an occupation, or even release from illness or abuses of a concentration camp. No one can kill the soul. It belongs to God. There is absolute power in that, and the power is shared between God’s allowance and man’s choice.
[1] Finding One’s Calling in Life, St. Vladimir’s Orthodox Theological Seminary, Crestwood, 2008.
[2] Marriage and family therapist and professor at Holy Cross Theological Seminary, recent guest speaker on Illumined Heart, hosted by Kevin Allen, topic: Marriage as a Path to Holiness.